____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

WILLETT, HOFMANN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers

Land Surveying - Transportation - Structural - Environmental - Architecture

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Home
Up

 

Captain Swift Timber Covered Bridge

Bureau County, Illinois

 

 

The Captain Swift Timber Covered Bridge was built entirely out of wood using 1800s concepts, yet it has two traffic lanes, is HS-20 rated, has a 16’-3” vertical clearance, a 28 foot minimum roadway width and is the only two lane covered bridge in Illinois.  Although it has the look and feel of a 19th century covered bridge, the Captain Swift Bridge was designed to 21st century safety and traffic standards with a unique blending of modern materials, historical accuracy, and an innovative design.  It is not merely an old fashioned method of crossing the creek, but a modern engineering marvel!

 

When the 90-year-old steel pratt thru truss bridge over Big Bureau Creek in Princeton Township needed replacement, the Township dreamed of a timber covered bridge that would compliment the picturesque rural landscape of the area.  WHA’s innovative design made the bridge economical by requiring the minimum amount of wood possible.  The bridge uses a burr arch in combination with an inverted kingpost truss.  The burr arch was patented in 1804, and the kingpost truss was the most common truss used in the 19th century for timber covered bridges.  The inverted kingpost truss has its diagonal members resisting the arches deformation when a live load travels across the bridge by having its diagonal members geometry orientated in a somewhat perpendicular fashion to the arch.  This allows the arch to carry a majority of the load while the truss keeps the arch in its desired shape.  This design allowed for the size necessary for a modern two lane bridge without distracting from the historic look and feel.

 

It was important to the client that the structure be entirely made of wood - a renewable, biodegradable, natural resource.  Rather than using timber solids, glulam (glue laminated wood) was used for the main load carrying components.  Glulam is stronger than solid timber and can be fabricated in any length.

 

Because it is an all-wood structure, fire protection was a unique issue.  Heat detectors were installed and linked to the sheriff department and fire station, and a spray-on fire protection was used.  A camera system allows 24-hour observation by the authorities and the public on the bridge’s own web page. 

 

The initial cost of the timber covered bridge is more than it would have cost for an equitable steel structure.  However the wood will not deteriorate from winter salt, and the roof will protect the structure and extend its life.  The Captain Swift Bridge may last 150 years or more.  Over the life of the bridge, the cost is less than a steel structure and is an economic benefit to tax payers. 

 

In addition to saving money, the bridge will also bring tourism dollars to the area.  According to the Illinois Bureau of Tourism, fifty tourists a day are expected to view the bridge, spending an average of $52 a visit as they stop for food, gas and rest. 

 

The bridge was completed in October, 2007.  In February of 2008 we were presented with a Special Achievement Award by the American Council of Engineering Companies of Illinois, and in June of 2008 WHA received the Juror’s Favorite Award as part of the Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards from the Structural Engineers Association of Illinois.  

 

Designing a two lane all timber covered bridge that was safe, historically accurate, on time and on budget was as an enormous challenge.  However, it was the unique challenges that made this project so intriguing to the WHA design team.

 

 

 

Scope of Work

· Topographic Survey

· Boundary Survey

· Feasibility Study

· Public Meetings to Obtain Local Support

· Design of Timber Bridge and Cover

· Construction Plans

· Construction Specifications

· Construction Stake-Out

· Shop Drawing Review

· Cost Estimate

· Removal of Existing Structure

· Preliminary Work for Major Bridge Funds Application

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last Updated:  12/04/2008
Page created and maintained by
© 2004 WHA Inc.